Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Hall of Fame Smorgasbord
Interesting interview with Bobby Hull and Phil Esposito over the weekend. They were talking about the good old days back when Espo was a rookie playing for the Blackhawks in the early 60's. Evidently, these guys spent many a late night on the town - I'm sure that shocks you all. Hull, Esposito, Kenny Wharram and Chico Maki were the chief participants who would come back to the hotel really hungry after a night of hard drinking and carousing. Back then there were no late night food joints open, so they canvassed all floors of the hotel and confiscated guest leftovers that were left outside the rooms. Yes, hamburgers with one or two bites taken out of them. They took the "stash" back to one their rooms and had a feast. They actually did this on numerous occasions and in the interview reminisced fondly at recollection of these antics.
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Automatic Notifications of Blog Updates - RSS Feeds or Twitter
Two easy ways to know when new content is published to my blog:
1) RSS Feeds. At the bottom left side of my blog there is a link that says 'Atom'. You right click on that link, select copy link, then add that link to whichever feed reader you use. I use Google Reader. Easy!
2) Twitter. Become a subscriber to my Twitter account 'neilrherron'. I will post 'tweets' each time I publish new content.
Feedback From Top Massachusetts High School Hockey List
We had some interesting feedback to my December 12, 2010 blog entry entitled The Top Massachusetts High School Hockey Players of All Time. My nephew, graduate of Reading HS, suggested Sean Collins and Steve Saviano. One of my friends, a former Boston College graduate, suggested Brian Boyle (St. Sebastian's) and Kevin Stevens (Silver Lake). Bias notwithstanding, some notable suggestions to the list.
We also had feedback from a NHL scout in the Boston-area. He put together a really good list by position:
Forwards
Robbie Ftorek
Bobby Carpenter
David Silk
Jeremy Roenick
Tony Amonte
Mike Fidler
Ralph Cox
George Hughes
Mark Fidler
Defense
Rod Langway
Jack O’Callahan
Mark Fusco
Dukie Walsh
Jack Hughes
Tom Poti
Goalies
Tom Barasso
Mark Holden
Honorable Mentions
Bobby Miller
Freddie Ahearn
John Cunniff
Greg Brown
Not a bad team at all!
We also had feedback from a NHL scout in the Boston-area. He put together a really good list by position:
Forwards
Robbie Ftorek
Bobby Carpenter
David Silk
Jeremy Roenick
Tony Amonte
Mike Fidler
Ralph Cox
George Hughes
Mark Fidler
Defense
Rod Langway
Jack O’Callahan
Mark Fusco
Dukie Walsh
Jack Hughes
Tom Poti
Goalies
Tom Barasso
Mark Holden
Honorable Mentions
Bobby Miller
Freddie Ahearn
John Cunniff
Greg Brown
Not a bad team at all!
Sunday, December 12, 2010
The Top Massachusetts High School Hockey Players of All Time
I have been asked on a number of occasions "Who were the best players in the history of Massachusetts high school hockey?" The response is typically the players listed below:
- Robbie Ftorek, Needham
- Richie Hebner, Norwood (yes Pirates fans, that Richie Hebner)
- Rod Langway, Randolph
- Bob Carpenter, St. John's
- Tom Barrasso, Acton-Boxborough
- Mike Fidler, Malden Catholic
- George Hughes, Malden Catholic
- Dave Silk, Thayer Academy
- Tony Amonte, Thayer Academy
- Jeremy Roenick, Thayer Academy
- Bob Sunderland, Braintree
- Ralph Cox, Archbishop Williams (last guy cut from 1980 Olympic Team)
- Randy Millen, Oliver Ames
- Jack O'Callahan, Boston Latin
- Cap Raeder, Needham
- Dukie Walsh, Matignon
- Bill O'Dwyer, Don Bosco
- Mark Holden, Weymouth
- Tom Glavine, Billerica (yes Braves fans, he played hockey)
- Bob McDonald, Winthrop
- Mark Fidler, Matignon
- Ted Donato, Catholic Memorial
- Shawn McEachern, Matignon
- Cleon Daskalakis, Thayer Academy
- Kevin Coughlin, South Boston
Friday, November 26, 2010
Gary Doak Signed By Islanders - Player Role As Shoot Out Specialist
OK, now that I have your intention, the Doak signing is not true. But, perhaps for a moment you thought it was, because nothing from the Islanders really surprises us anymore. What is driving the Islanders into the ground is Charles Wang and a myriad of poor choices he has made as owner of this team.
In any business, leadership at the top sets the strategy and culture within an organization in its pursuit of success. It is interesting to look at rankings of the best and worst owners in the NHL. The top 5 are listed below:
1. Mike Ilitch, Detroit Red Wings
2. Jeffrey Vanderbeek, New Jersey Devils
3. Mario Lemieux and Ron Burkle, Pittsburgh Penquins
4. Silicon Valley Sports & Entertainment, San Jose Sharks
5. Peter Karmonos, Carolina Hurricaines
The worst 5 are provided below:
1. MLSE, Toronto Maple Leafs
2. Alan Cohen, Florida Panthers
3. Charles Wang, New York Islanders
4. Atlanta Spirit, Atlanta Thrashers
5. Predator Holdings, Nashville Predators
Source: Sports Illustrated, May 2009
I think these lists are relatively accurate. Frankly, I would add Ted Leonsis of the Washington Capitals to the list of the best. He is a bright guy, has built a fine organization, has a capable GM and arguably the best coach in hockey. Strong ownership is a huge differentiator for a prospective player when they consider the +/-'s of a given city. Quality ownership attracts the more talented players, it's that simple. Strong owners have infiltrated their organizations with outstanding hockey people that are extraordinary at judging talent.
Another addition to the worst owners list would be Jeremy Jacobs of the Boston Bruins. He has owned the Bruins for more than thirty years without a Stanley Cup. While I do believe Jacobs is on the right track, as Peter Chiarelli and Cam Neely are quite capable, he stuck far too long with Harry Sinden and he is still paying the price for it. As for the order of the poorly ranked owners, I maintain Charles Wang is unquestionably the worst. Just look at his track record as founder of Computer Associates (CA). For me this served as a really accurate predictor of what was to come with the New York Islanders when he became part owner in 2000 and full owner in 2004.
While at CA, Mr. Wang's career had considerable controversy. He spearheaded over fifty takeovers. In most cases these takeovers were followed by immediate firing of top management and key employees. The most despicable of these practices included forcing the employees of newly acquired company to sign new employment contracts on-the-spot at a company meeting with no prior warning - employees who refused to sign at the meeting or wished to have the contracts reviewed by a third party prior to signing were summarily fired. Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle once quipped, CA is where all good software goes to rest. Once a really good software company was acquired by CA, typically its employees and customers ran like the wind.
In 2000 a civil action lawsuit accused Wang, co-founder Russell Artzt, and President Sanjay Kumar of wrongfully reporting $2.5 billion of revenues in 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000. This was done with the intention of inflating CA's stock price. Since 2000, four other class action suites have been filed against CA, all of them specifically cited Wang.
So, the NHL in its infinite wisdom, approves Mr. Wang becoming owner of the Islanders. What ensued has been a series of poor decisions that is driving this once storied franchise into the ground, let's take a look:
In any business, leadership at the top sets the strategy and culture within an organization in its pursuit of success. It is interesting to look at rankings of the best and worst owners in the NHL. The top 5 are listed below:
1. Mike Ilitch, Detroit Red Wings
2. Jeffrey Vanderbeek, New Jersey Devils
3. Mario Lemieux and Ron Burkle, Pittsburgh Penquins
4. Silicon Valley Sports & Entertainment, San Jose Sharks
5. Peter Karmonos, Carolina Hurricaines
The worst 5 are provided below:
1. MLSE, Toronto Maple Leafs
2. Alan Cohen, Florida Panthers
3. Charles Wang, New York Islanders
4. Atlanta Spirit, Atlanta Thrashers
5. Predator Holdings, Nashville Predators
Source: Sports Illustrated, May 2009
I think these lists are relatively accurate. Frankly, I would add Ted Leonsis of the Washington Capitals to the list of the best. He is a bright guy, has built a fine organization, has a capable GM and arguably the best coach in hockey. Strong ownership is a huge differentiator for a prospective player when they consider the +/-'s of a given city. Quality ownership attracts the more talented players, it's that simple. Strong owners have infiltrated their organizations with outstanding hockey people that are extraordinary at judging talent.
Another addition to the worst owners list would be Jeremy Jacobs of the Boston Bruins. He has owned the Bruins for more than thirty years without a Stanley Cup. While I do believe Jacobs is on the right track, as Peter Chiarelli and Cam Neely are quite capable, he stuck far too long with Harry Sinden and he is still paying the price for it. As for the order of the poorly ranked owners, I maintain Charles Wang is unquestionably the worst. Just look at his track record as founder of Computer Associates (CA). For me this served as a really accurate predictor of what was to come with the New York Islanders when he became part owner in 2000 and full owner in 2004.
While at CA, Mr. Wang's career had considerable controversy. He spearheaded over fifty takeovers. In most cases these takeovers were followed by immediate firing of top management and key employees. The most despicable of these practices included forcing the employees of newly acquired company to sign new employment contracts on-the-spot at a company meeting with no prior warning - employees who refused to sign at the meeting or wished to have the contracts reviewed by a third party prior to signing were summarily fired. Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle once quipped, CA is where all good software goes to rest. Once a really good software company was acquired by CA, typically its employees and customers ran like the wind.
In 2000 a civil action lawsuit accused Wang, co-founder Russell Artzt, and President Sanjay Kumar of wrongfully reporting $2.5 billion of revenues in 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000. This was done with the intention of inflating CA's stock price. Since 2000, four other class action suites have been filed against CA, all of them specifically cited Wang.
So, the NHL in its infinite wisdom, approves Mr. Wang becoming owner of the Islanders. What ensued has been a series of poor decisions that is driving this once storied franchise into the ground, let's take a look:
- Keeping Mike "Gimme Your Shoe" Milbury in place too long. Milbury's tenure as Islander GM was littered with poor trades. He traded away Zdeno Chara, Wade Redden, Bryan Berard, Eric Brewer, Darius Kasparaitis, and Bryan McCabe; goalies Roberto Luongo and Tommy Salo, as well as forwards Olli Jokinen, Todd Bertuzzi, Tim Connolly, and Raffi Torres. Chara, Brewer, Luongo, Jokinen, Connelly, and Torres trades were conducted by Milbury under Wang's ownership. "Gimme Your Shoe" also selected Rick DiPietro first overall in the 2000 draft when both Dany Heatley and Marian Gaborik were available. To make matters worse he signed this mediocre unproven goalie, DiPietro, to a ten year $67 million dollar contract that Wang had to approve. This crappy contract and the salary cap will encumber the Islanders for years.
- Fires GM Neil Smith after 40 days. Wang gave Smith very little latitude in personnel and staffing decisions. Instead Wang wanted to subject the GM's decisions to ratification by a committee of advisors. Can you imagine what draft day in a circus like this would be like?
- Senior Advisor Pat Lafontaine quits after 10 days on the job. Guess the advisors were not on board with this approach either.
- Hires Garth Snow as General Manager. NO experience at all. Great goaltender, no clue on how to run a hockey club.
- Rescinds access to blogger Chris Botta for reporting facts about the Islanders. Seems Mr. Botta expressed his disagreement with the recent firing of Islander coach Scott Gordon. Botta indicated Gordon was in a "no win" situation given the only way the Islanders are meeting the cap floor is via massive buyouts. He also cited DiPietro's ridiculous contract and Snow's ineptness at constructing a hockey team.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Colin Campbell and the Demise of the NHL
You gotta love it. Hockey season is in full swing and as of this writing five of the six original teams have winning records. The only exception is the Chicago Blackhawks at 10-10, but we'll let that slide because they are the defending champs, so really all is good with the NHL...or is it?
Actually, the NHL has a really big problem that needs to be addressed post-haste. You will recollect my blog dated March 13, 2010 entitled Colin Campbell and Player Safety. In this entry I questioned Campbell's competence and pointed out he imperils player safety. I stated this for the following reasons, as it relates to his decision not to suspend Matt Cooke for his hit on Marc Savard:
1) You ignored Matt Cooke's track record - he is a repeat offender.
2) You are confused between incidental and intentional contact.
3) Two wrongs do not make it right. You got the Richards incident wrong and you got the Cooke incident wrong as well.
4) Rare player outrage. Credible players across the league such as Vincent Lecavalier, Martin St. Louis and Mark Recchi are surprised at your decision.
5) You are inconsistent in your rulings. Cooke suspensions were meted out when he checked Artem Anisimov and Scott Walker. In the case of Anisimov, the elbow was flagrant; less so with Savard, but the intent to injure was still there.
6) You are incapable of interpreting the rules. Rule 21.1 is applicable here. Either you do not understand the rule or, in the interest of self-preservation, you elected not to apply it.
Quite frankly, I was perplexed by this decision not to suspend Cooke. But I believe we now know why. Check out this email from Colin Campbell to NHL officiating director Stephen Walkom:
To Stephen Walkom/Tor/NHL@NHL
Subject Re: Delayed Penalties/High Sticks 02/#/2007 4:24 pm
A bend in the road is a dead end if you round the corner and Dean Warren is standing there. Your answer re: his high stick calls and the score of the game were horse [bleep]. The 3rd call on [player] was while they were down 5 on 4 and on a def zone face off vs that little fake artist [player] I had him in [city] biggest faker going. And Warren fell for it when he grabbed his face on a face off. Your supposed to see the act, not call the embellishing act. Dean Warren has to go with [referee] There must be a way to get rid of this guy. Is there a way we can tract (sic) and total minors called by referees this year. We could then get the minors they call per game. ... or with 2 [referees on the ice] it is impossible? Warren and [referee] out of [club's] games. Give them to [referees].
Really scary folks, according to the Puck Daddy blog, Campbell is referring to a game between the Bruins and Florida Panthers on February 24, 2007. Let's decode this email, Dean Warren was the referree, Gregory Campbell (Colin Campbell's son) got three minor penalties, and Marc Savard played for Campbell when he coached the New York Rangers. The fake artist being referred to here is Bruins' Marc Savard. So there you have it, you now know why there was no suspension for Matt Cooke's hit on Savard!
Actually, these emails from Campbell are a bit incendiary and cause me great concern about the integrity of the game. Noted Boston Globe Sports Columnist Kevin Paul Dupont wrote an excellent article in the Boston Globe earlier this week about the same subject, you can read it at:
http://www.boston.com/sports/hockey/bruins/articles/2010/11/16/actions_by_top_nhl_enforcer_should_draw_a_major_penalty/?page=full
In this article Dupont suggests Campbell might be better served by keeping his opinions to himself instead of ranting in an email.
As long as Colin Campbell is in his current role, every NHL game I watch will now be viewed as just a little less than authentic. Colin Campbell must go!
Stay thirsty my friends....
Actually, the NHL has a really big problem that needs to be addressed post-haste. You will recollect my blog dated March 13, 2010 entitled Colin Campbell and Player Safety. In this entry I questioned Campbell's competence and pointed out he imperils player safety. I stated this for the following reasons, as it relates to his decision not to suspend Matt Cooke for his hit on Marc Savard:
1) You ignored Matt Cooke's track record - he is a repeat offender.
2) You are confused between incidental and intentional contact.
3) Two wrongs do not make it right. You got the Richards incident wrong and you got the Cooke incident wrong as well.
4) Rare player outrage. Credible players across the league such as Vincent Lecavalier, Martin St. Louis and Mark Recchi are surprised at your decision.
5) You are inconsistent in your rulings. Cooke suspensions were meted out when he checked Artem Anisimov and Scott Walker. In the case of Anisimov, the elbow was flagrant; less so with Savard, but the intent to injure was still there.
6) You are incapable of interpreting the rules. Rule 21.1 is applicable here. Either you do not understand the rule or, in the interest of self-preservation, you elected not to apply it.
Quite frankly, I was perplexed by this decision not to suspend Cooke. But I believe we now know why. Check out this email from Colin Campbell to NHL officiating director Stephen Walkom:
To Stephen Walkom/Tor/NHL@NHL
Subject Re: Delayed Penalties/High Sticks 02/#/2007 4:24 pm
A bend in the road is a dead end if you round the corner and Dean Warren is standing there. Your answer re: his high stick calls and the score of the game were horse [bleep]. The 3rd call on [player] was while they were down 5 on 4 and on a def zone face off vs that little fake artist [player] I had him in [city] biggest faker going. And Warren fell for it when he grabbed his face on a face off. Your supposed to see the act, not call the embellishing act. Dean Warren has to go with [referee] There must be a way to get rid of this guy. Is there a way we can tract (sic) and total minors called by referees this year. We could then get the minors they call per game. ... or with 2 [referees on the ice] it is impossible? Warren and [referee] out of [club's] games. Give them to [referees].
Really scary folks, according to the Puck Daddy blog, Campbell is referring to a game between the Bruins and Florida Panthers on February 24, 2007. Let's decode this email, Dean Warren was the referree, Gregory Campbell (Colin Campbell's son) got three minor penalties, and Marc Savard played for Campbell when he coached the New York Rangers. The fake artist being referred to here is Bruins' Marc Savard. So there you have it, you now know why there was no suspension for Matt Cooke's hit on Savard!
Actually, these emails from Campbell are a bit incendiary and cause me great concern about the integrity of the game. Noted Boston Globe Sports Columnist Kevin Paul Dupont wrote an excellent article in the Boston Globe earlier this week about the same subject, you can read it at:
http://www.boston.com/sports/hockey/bruins/articles/2010/11/16/actions_by_top_nhl_enforcer_should_draw_a_major_penalty/?page=full
In this article Dupont suggests Campbell might be better served by keeping his opinions to himself instead of ranting in an email.
As long as Colin Campbell is in his current role, every NHL game I watch will now be viewed as just a little less than authentic. Colin Campbell must go!
Stay thirsty my friends....
Saturday, October 2, 2010
A New Season Upon Us
First, apologies for the lack of blog entries since June, but I have a good excuse. I've been filming Dos Equis beer commercials over the summer...
Well a new season beckons, but first we talk about last year's Stanley Cup Champion, the Chicago Blackhawks. A tremendous hockey team for the most fanatic and arguably the best fans in hockey. The scary thing about this team is they will be formidable again this year. Any team with Duncan Keith, Brent Seabrook, Patrick Kane, Jonathon Toews and Patrick Sharp is enough of a nucleus to make another run. Yes they have had some housecleaning and yes they have let go some great players (a legacy of Dale Talon snafu's) but the Hawks are still loaded; their leadership, Stan Bowman and Joel Quenneville, are tremendous judges of hockey talent.
There a few other items on my mind. One troubling development is the high number of UFA's still looking for a place to work, you can view the current list at:
http://espn.go.com/nhl/freeagents/_/type/available
There are some big names on this list, particularly goaltenders. What is concerning here is a trend developing in the NHL to bring lesser quality players into the league sooner. These young players come in at entry level salaries in order to get a given team under the cap. This is a big sore spot with college coaches losing players to the NHL and the Canadian Junior leagues. Think about it, when a kid is lost mid-season, the scholarship is lost and it's real difficult to replace the player. I believe college hockey is at the crossroads if this does not get fixed. In fact, I am willing to bet this single issue will drive Boston University coach Jack Parker into retirement. The other collateral damage is the NHL-fan watches watered down talent who prematurely push more capable UFA's out of the league. No winners here, except possibly the KHL.
Well now that I am on my soapbox, why step off? Interesting article in today's Washington Post in the Free For All section. A disgruntled Tony Eckert writes-in that the area's premier sports franchise (Washington Capitals) warrants coverage commensurate with the team's performance. I agree with Tony, I've been saying this for years. My recommendation, if you really want to get a clue with what is going on in the NHL, is to check out the Boston Globe Sports Section at:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/#globesports
other suggestions are the Toronto Globe and Mail or reading Red Fisher of the Montreal Gazette, in fact here's a good article he wrote about Bobby Orr in today's Gazette:
http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=d4f013d5-e3d7-4c53-aa5c-25b78d0b95e2
These publications are not Caps-centric but are a more preferred alternative to the Post. Ahh, the Internet, we aren't stuck with Washington's hockey writing. Incidentally, Red Fisher states Bobby Orr was the best ever, he's right but Ovechkin is really, really getting close.
Well a new season beckons, but first we talk about last year's Stanley Cup Champion, the Chicago Blackhawks. A tremendous hockey team for the most fanatic and arguably the best fans in hockey. The scary thing about this team is they will be formidable again this year. Any team with Duncan Keith, Brent Seabrook, Patrick Kane, Jonathon Toews and Patrick Sharp is enough of a nucleus to make another run. Yes they have had some housecleaning and yes they have let go some great players (a legacy of Dale Talon snafu's) but the Hawks are still loaded; their leadership, Stan Bowman and Joel Quenneville, are tremendous judges of hockey talent.
There a few other items on my mind. One troubling development is the high number of UFA's still looking for a place to work, you can view the current list at:
http://espn.go.com/nhl/freeagents/_/type/available
There are some big names on this list, particularly goaltenders. What is concerning here is a trend developing in the NHL to bring lesser quality players into the league sooner. These young players come in at entry level salaries in order to get a given team under the cap. This is a big sore spot with college coaches losing players to the NHL and the Canadian Junior leagues. Think about it, when a kid is lost mid-season, the scholarship is lost and it's real difficult to replace the player. I believe college hockey is at the crossroads if this does not get fixed. In fact, I am willing to bet this single issue will drive Boston University coach Jack Parker into retirement. The other collateral damage is the NHL-fan watches watered down talent who prematurely push more capable UFA's out of the league. No winners here, except possibly the KHL.
Well now that I am on my soapbox, why step off? Interesting article in today's Washington Post in the Free For All section. A disgruntled Tony Eckert writes-in that the area's premier sports franchise (Washington Capitals) warrants coverage commensurate with the team's performance. I agree with Tony, I've been saying this for years. My recommendation, if you really want to get a clue with what is going on in the NHL, is to check out the Boston Globe Sports Section at:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/#globesports
other suggestions are the Toronto Globe and Mail or reading Red Fisher of the Montreal Gazette, in fact here's a good article he wrote about Bobby Orr in today's Gazette:
http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=d4f013d5-e3d7-4c53-aa5c-25b78d0b95e2
These publications are not Caps-centric but are a more preferred alternative to the Post. Ahh, the Internet, we aren't stuck with Washington's hockey writing. Incidentally, Red Fisher states Bobby Orr was the best ever, he's right but Ovechkin is really, really getting close.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)